war on women
The motive for the assault remains a mystery
I've tried to blog about this twice now. I am nearly unable to think I am so mad. Don't like angry women? Fuck off and get the hell out. No unmoderated comments on this post folks. I'm not providing a forum for any man egos I might hurt or for any women who want to prove just how liberated they are by siding with their oppressors.
Every time I think of this, I cry.
It occurs to me that there are two very clear levels of reflection here.
One is deeper and involves the frequent questions that eventually come to mind when any atrocity occurs. Reaction on this level manifest in forms like: "Why do people hate so much?" "What moves someone to hate another group of people so deeply they would commit such horrific violence?" In this context, it would be absurd to wonder what Hitler's personal motive was, for example. We know enough to identify it as racism, antisemitism, hatred of Jews. To even say "Pathological hatred of X", unless "X" is "women", is just insane at this level. That kind of hate is always pathological.
However, when it's violence against women, we see evidence of another level of response. It is so common it almost entirely overshadows the deeper one. It is predicated on too many people having bought the myth of equality between sexes in this country, the myth that allows intelligent educated people to talk and write and publish about things like the "war on boys". From this level of ignorance, which seems like it should properly be called stupidity given the immediate and unavoidable reality of the situaiton, come the questions of motive. These quesitons are being published and republished, perpetuating an active denial of the facts of the situation.
"No motive yet known"
"Still no motive"
"We don't know why"
"I don’t know why he wanted to do this"
The simple and straight forward answer to the question of motive is hatred of women. It's oppression of women which is so ingrained in our society that it is not just condoned but promoted. It gives tacit and sometimes explicit approval for desires to commit sexualized violence and brutality on women. Don't like it? Does that bother your god damned "liberated man" "I'm not a feminist I'm a humanist" pollyanna universe? Hey, here's a page out of your book - Get over it. It fucking exists.
In a less wrong world, we'd see news blurbs like these:
"Yet another instance of gender motivate violence rocked a small community today..."
"Today's shooting is a reminder of the epidemic of violence against women in this country..."
"Reaction to Colorado shooting: Why do sexually violent men blend in? Are we a country of rapists?"
Instead of people sitting down and saying "hey what the hell is going on here with all the rapes and shit?" we have people who want to use the phrase "war on boys" when even the smallest bit of reparation is made or even token amends are attempted for the criminal inquality between the sexes in our society. So when your boys are lined up at gunpoint, taken hostage and threatened, systematically terrorized, sexually assaulted, and killed by a woman who has no other reason than a pathology that is so common she has apparently not stood out as having dangerous criminal intent prior to this act, THEN you can talk about a war on boys. Until then, SHUT the FUCK up.